Breakout Nations: In pursuit of the next economic miracles

The author, from the book’s homepage

Ruchir Sharma, head of emerging markets for Morgan Stanley, visits the RSA to discusses emerging markets.

Summary:
Two great stories of the last decade, the global financial crisis, and unparalleled worldwide economic growth. We here talk about the second, as the first has been told many times.

The IMF tracks some 180 economies. In any one year, we normally see 1/3 grow at rates above 5%, and 1/5 contract. In 2007, everyone grew and only 3 (not 3%, 3) contracted.
The conventional wisdom became that these markets were now unstoppable, and would soon converge to Westerns standards/levels. Mr. Sharma points out that the conventional wisdom is never quite right. He has a principle:

The unexpected always happens, the inevitable never does.

He also notices tremendous arrogance in several BRIC nations. Given that this time is not different, what is the historical pattern, and what drove the growth over the last 10 years?

Historically, the IMF has 35 developed economies, and the rest are not. This has been stable for a very long time. Economic growth is a bit like snakes and ladders, or you can make survival curves for the time-frame that econ growth can be sustained. Only two countries lasted over 40 years (taiwan and korea, if I remember).

What drove the 2000 boom? Easy liquidity, and a rebound from the horrors of the 1990s.

Conclusion: things don’t look good for them over the next few years, though there are exceptions.

How do we find the exceptions? First, define what we are looking for. Economic growth which exceeds expectations over the next 3-5 years. Anything farther out is not interesting.

He gives two examples of metrics he uses to predict breakout nations. He claims to have about 10, the others are in his book in occult form.

The two given in the talk are the 4 Seasons Index and the Billionaire Index.

4 seasons: compare the price of a high-end hotel room. Brazil/Russia it is 1K/night, India is 1/3rd of that. Implies B/R are expensive, making them less, much less, competitive. Reminiscent of the Big Mac index.

Billionaire: Compare #billionaires to size of economy, also look at #millionaires. Does absolute ranking correspond to normalized ranking? Do we see evidence of entrepeneurship? Are the billionaires made by connections to the state or by private inititive?

Sounds like he is measuring if the country’s institutions are inclusive or exclusive.

Advertisements

Posted on May 23, 2012, in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: